Disclaimer: I am not against vaccination. Read that again. This is not a poem written with the intention of changing minds, but rather opening them to research loopholes, that honestly, I myself was shocked to find.
I write this disclaimer because I have no intention of being a poster child for the anti-vaccination movement.
There are two sides to every story and though the benefits of vaccination are evident in the significant decrease of infectious disease outbreaks we witness in society, it does appear that preliminary research is giving us cause to question a one-size-fits-most schedule as well as the “placebo” injections used in safety trials.
I wonder whether in time, brilliant minds will find ways to make immunisations without ingredients that pose a threat to vulnerable subsections of the population or, alternatively, pioneer immune-building alternatives that revolutionise the practice of preventative medicine.
This poem endeavours to start a conversation, about the controversial topic of immunisation.
Discussing the science (or lack thereof) as it currently stands, to feed lesser known information into our deserving hands.
Repeatedly touted as ‘safe and effective, it’s hard to consider the alternative; defective.
Let’s begin with how ‘safety’ studies are done, it’s rather dodgy, so this discussion is fun.
Placebos are rarely, if ever, inert, and this no doubt has potential to hurt.
The ‘placebo’ is often another vaccine, which ethically-speaking is fraudulent and mean.
A true placebo would be saline solution, not the likes of Amorphous Aluminium Hydroxyphosphate Sulfate pollution.
Also known as AAHS, this immune hyper-stimulator causes pro-inflammatory stress.
When injuries present after both intervention and ‘control’, adversities are ignored and onto market syringes roll.
Without inert placebo we can’t measure safety, and thus any claims of such are deceitfully hasty.
It’s parroted that aluminium dosages are harmless and fine, yet this ‘bumpersticker’ statement crosses a scientific line.
You see, not all aluminium behaves the same, which is why such an adjuvant recruits such blame.
Injections aren’t comparable to exposure from food, so don’t feed me that rebuttal, I’m not in the mood.
What’s contained in injections is a different type, yet this is not what you’ll gather from media hype.
Ingested aluminium answers to mucous membranes, kidneys and livers; biophysical networks of selfless givers.
Very little ingested aluminium is actually absorbed because our detox organs are intelligent, Mother Nature; I applaud.
Injected aluminium subtypes evade such barriers, a key reason they’re deemed effective carriers.
Immediately these heavy metals enter circulation, where they get to work initiating excess inflammation.
Certain forms have affinity for brain tissue, and thus encephalopathy becomes a concerning issue.
Wherever aluminium travels, damage may occur, and many hundreds of injuries may be incurred.
Yes, a single dose may be reasonably low, but we often receive several doses in one go.
This accumulation deserves contemplation, because the higher the load, the more copious the inflammation.
When it comes to risk some are more vulnerable than others, a genuine concern shared by thousands of mothers.
This risk may be higher due to certain genes, and we should test such a factor as we have the means.
Vaccines are still drugs and deserve individual consideration, not a blanket schedule for an entire nation.
This poem touches on one excipient that we’re urged to ignore, but there are many others – it’s roulette galore.
Another concern I’ll include in this chatter, is that viruses are cultured on animal matter.
Monkeys, Cows, Chickens and Aborted Babies – so many questions, so many maybes.
Could it be that their DNA combines with our strands? Is gene mutation possible? Answers I demand!
Also, we’re familiar with MRSA, the anti-biotic resistant bacteria causing much disarray?
Do we not suppose mass injection could mutate viral DNA? If this is possible, what price will we pay?
Lastly, what are we injecting for? To thwart a rash, sloppy poos, a few dots, maybe more?
There are bigger concerns, such as paralysis. Yet this still presents as (sometimes vaccine-induced) transverse myelitis.
And I get that whooping cough has new parents dreading, yet it’s the DTaP vaccine that can cause asymptomatic viral shedding.
Are we trading childhood infection for chronic disease? Cancer and Autoimmunities?
After all, the brains of those with Autism Spectrum Disorders are shown to be quite the aluminium hoarders.
Have I gone too far? Jumped the gun? Who knows – too few studies have been done.
Why am I passionate? Why do I care? Because conclusive safety science isn’t there.
I best end things here before you ‘at’ me, but perhaps this poem has helped you to see …
Our debate is not rooted in pro- or anti- (vaccination), but in preventing immunological taxation.
We all desire safety, we’re all ‘pro’ health – arguably life’s greatest wealth.
Below is my call to action, and I’d love it gain at least a wee bit or traction.
Look at the science – the independent at that. We can’t trust the money trail, along which lies told are fat.
I didn’t write this to give you a fright, but to remind you that informed consent is your right.
Don’t let anyone bully you into submission. It is YOUR (or your child’s) body and thus YOUR decision.
Read some papers and raise your voice, because wherever there’s risk, there needs to be choice.